← Back to Opinions
Conspiracy Theories

“Go to Hell”

Robbie Blue · Deep State Club · July 16, 2026

JD Vance Tells Israel’s War Lobby What He Thinks of Them. He Is Right. And the Implications Are Enormous.

On Wednesday, in a three-hour interview on the Joe Rogan Experience, Vice President JD Vance said something that no senior American official has said publicly about Israel in a very long time.

JD Vance revealed that elements within the Israeli government were trying to derail negotiations with Iran and manipulate American public opinion to keep the war going, lashing out at those behind the campaign and telling them to “go to hell.”

Vance warned of a “very discreet, extremely well-funded campaign” to derail negotiations between the U.S. and Iran. “What does bother me is when those operations, those influence campaigns, actually affect American political judgment, because they shouldn’t. Because we should be thinking, What is in the best interest of the United States of America?”

The vice president of the United States told a foreign government’s influence operation to go to hell on the world’s largest podcast. This is not a normal sentence in American political history.

What He Was Talking About

Vance was referring to former Trump campaign manager Brad Parscale, who now runs a communications firm called Clock Tower X. Last summer, Israel started paying Parscale’s firm $1.5 million a month to create 100 pieces of digital content every month to be shared across multiple social media platforms.

Parscale also promised the “integration of narrative messaging into Salem Media Network properties and aligned distribution channels.”

Salem Media Group is one of the largest conservative media conglomerates in the United States. Its radio stations, websites, and podcast network reach tens of millions of conservative Americans. The integration of Israeli government-funded messaging into that network — at $1.5 million a month — is the most direct example of foreign government influence in American conservative media that has been publicly documented in years.

“There are some people within their system, we know beyond a shadow of a doubt, who are manipulating and trying to change American public opinion to keep the war going on indefinitely. Again, not towards any objective, but just indefinitely,” Vance said.

Not towards any objective. Just indefinitely. The vice president is saying, with apparent documentation, that elements of the Israeli government were paying American conservative media to keep a war going without a defined end state. Not to achieve a specific strategic outcome. Just to keep it going.

The Larger Point

This essay is not an anti-Israel essay. Vance himself was careful to distinguish between the Israeli government, which he respects, individual ministers who have been counterproductive, and the specific influence operation he is describing. The point is not that Israel is bad. The point is that $1.5 million a month in foreign government money flowing into American conservative media to shape American public opinion about an American war is something the American public deserves to know about.

“What really bothers me is when Americans allow that influence to affect their decisions.”

That sentence applies to more than Israel. It applies to Qatar, which gave Trump a $400 million plane. It applies to Saudi Arabia, which invested $2 billion in Jared Kushner’s fund. It applies to every foreign government that has found that access to the American administration can be purchased through the right channel at the right price.

Vance is right that foreign influence campaigns are the nature of geopolitics in 2026. He is also right that when Americans allow that influence to determine policy — when a $1.5 million monthly content contract can shape what millions of conservative Americans think about a war — something has gone badly wrong with the information environment that democracy depends on.

He said go to hell. He meant it. The question is whether anyone in his administration applies the same scrutiny to the influence campaigns that are benefiting them rather than inconveniencing them.

Leave a Comment

Scroll to Top